Sportsbettingcentre

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: FA Cup carnage - did Sportsbettingcentre get it right?


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 16
Date:
FA Cup carnage - did Sportsbettingcentre get it right?


On the site we predicted that there would be some good value going on the underdogs in Round Three of the FA Cup as the bigger sides concentrate increasingly on Premier League progress.

Did we get it right?  Let the post-mortems begin.

__________________
Sportsbettingcentre
Sportsbettingcentre - The Blog
The Sportsbettingcentre Casino Blog - The Punter's Choice


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:

Tottenham beat Wigan, seems you were wrong?

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 16
Date:

Supremo wrote:

Tottenham beat Wigan, seems you were wrong?



Welcome to the forum Supremo.  However, we didn't make any predictions about the Spurs/Wigan game.

 



__________________
Sportsbettingcentre
Sportsbettingcentre - The Blog
The Sportsbettingcentre Casino Blog - The Punter's Choice


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 16
Date:

The answer, it seems, was a qualified "yes".  Anybody placing a common stake on each of the thirteen games listed on the site at the best price available would have made an albeit negligible profit.

However, in retrospect the smart advice would have been to have laid the favourite rather than backing the underdog.  Five out of thirteen positive outcomes would have been more than enough to have secured a reasonable return on your investment. wink

__________________
Sportsbettingcentre
Sportsbettingcentre - The Blog
The Sportsbettingcentre Casino Blog - The Punter's Choice


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Date:

sportsbettingcentre wrote:

The answer, it seems, was a qualified "yes".  Anybody placing a common stake on each of the thirteen games listed on the site at the best price available would have made an albeit negligible profit.

However, in retrospect the smart advice would have been to have laid the favourite rather than backing the underdog.  Five out of thirteen positive outcomes would have been more than enough to have secured a reasonable return on your investment. wink



It would also have been a good idea to have backed Chelsea etc. in the replays.  There is seldom an upset at the second attempt in games like this.

 



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard